InVideo AI vs Kling AI vs Pika vs Runway

A side-by-side look at InVideo AI, Kling AI, Pika and Runway for filmmakers: what each one can do, what it costs, and where they actually differ.

  • AI assistant editor on a real multitrack timeline, with a free manual editor

    Price
    Free plan; paid plans per seat from €20/mo (€10/mo billed annually)
    Learning
    Moderate
    Best for
    Short social, ad and explainer videos built from generated clips, stock and talking-head footage
  • Text, image and video-reference AI video with native audio, lip-sync and shot storyboarding

    Price
    See the vendor's pricing page
    Learning
    Moderate
    Best for
    Character-driven short films that need the same actor across many shots
  • AI video, image and audio studio that routes between Seedance, Veo and Pika's own models

    Price
    Starter $10/mo ($8/mo billed yearly); Creator $35/mo; Enterprise custom
    Learning
    Easy
    Best for
    Fast social and product clips that need dialogue or a sound bed in one pass
  • Gen-4.5 video, Aleph 2.0 video editing and an agent that builds whole ad campaigns

    Price
    Free (125 one-time credits); Standard $15/mo ($12/mo billed annually)
    Learning
    Easy
    Best for
    Previs and shot tests with Gen-4.5 before committing to a shoot
The short version

Where they differ

  • Kling AI is the only one without third-party models.
  • InVideo AI is the only one without public API.

All 4 offer: text to image, text to video, image to video.

Feature by feature

InVideo AI vs Kling AI vs Pika vs Runway: capabilities

InVideo AI vs Kling AI vs Pika vs Runway
InVideo AI Kling AI Pika Runway
Price Free plan; paid plans per seat from €20/mo (€10/mo billed annually) See the vendor's pricing page Starter $10/mo ($8/mo billed yearly); Creator $35/mo; Enterprise custom Free (125 one-time credits); Standard $15/mo ($12/mo billed annually)
Infinite canvas No Partial No Not confirmed
Node / flow builder No Not confirmed No Yes
AI agent Yes Not confirmed Partial Yes
Chat assistant Yes Not confirmed Partial Yes
Team collaboration Yes Not confirmed Not confirmed Yes
Text to image Yes Yes Yes Yes
Image editing Yes Not confirmed Yes Yes
Text to video Yes Yes Yes Yes
Image to video Yes Yes Yes Yes
Video to video Not confirmed Yes Yes Yes
Native audio in video Not confirmed Yes Yes Partial
Lip-sync Yes Yes Partial Not confirmed
Voice / TTS Yes Partial Yes Yes
Music & SFX Yes Not confirmed Yes Yes
Upscaling Yes Not confirmed Not confirmed Yes
Character consistency Yes Yes Yes Partial
Camera control Partial Yes Partial Not confirmed
Custom training Not confirmed Not confirmed Not confirmed Partial
Third-party models Yes No Yes Yes
Public API No Yes Yes Yes
MCP server Yes Not confirmed Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Not confirmed Yes Yes
Free tier Yes Yes Partial Yes
Commercial use Not confirmed Yes Partial Not confirmed

Each column comes from that tool's own researched page. "Not confirmed" means the vendor doesn't say.

Plans

Pricing compared

InVideo AI

InVideo AI plans
Free€0weekly quota
Starter€20monthly (€10/mo billed annually)
Plus€60monthly (€30/mo billed annually)
Max€150monthly (€75/mo billed annually)

Kling AI

Kling AI plans
Free$0monthly

Pika

Pika plans
Free$0monthly
Starter$10 ($8 yearly)monthly or yearly
Creator$35monthly or yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
API Club$10monthly membership

Runway

Runway plans
Free$0none
Standard$15monthly
Pro$35monthly
Max$95monthly
The verdict

Which one should you pick?

InVideo AI

Pick it for

  • Short social, ad and explainer videos built from generated clips, stock and talking-head footage
  • Cutting talking-head, podcast and multicam recordings: silences, filler, angle switching and chapters
  • Editors who want an AI first pass and then finish in Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro or DaVinci Resolve

Stands out

  • The AI works on a real multitrack timeline, and every edit it makes can be adjusted by hand afterwards.
  • Exports an editable project to Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro or DaVinci Resolve with cuts and layers intact, so the AI cut can move into a finishing workflow.

Watch out

  • Credits are per seat and do not roll over to the next month
  • Seedance 2.0 at 4K and Seedance 2.5 are only on Plus and Max; Starter gets Seedance 2.0 Fast and Mini
Full InVideo AI review →

Kling AI

Pick it for

  • Character-driven short films that need the same actor across many shots
  • Previs and storyboard visualisation from shot-by-shot prompts
  • Multi-language talking-head and dubbed social content

Stands out

  • Video 3.0 Omni reference system: carries a character's look, expressions and voice traits from reference clips into new shots
  • Storyboarding sets duration, shot size, perspective and camera movement per shot, which few generators expose this directly

Watch out

  • Free output is watermarked and not for commercial use
  • Lip-sync and voice are less of a focus than dedicated voice tools (ElevenLabs, HeyGen)
Full Kling AI review →

Pika

Pick it for

  • Fast social and product clips that need dialogue or a sound bed in one pass
  • Character and product consistency across a short campaign using @-mentioned references
  • Generating voice-over and sound effects for an edit without a second audio subscription

Stands out

  • Multi-model access on every plan, including Free: Seedance 2.5, Pika 2.5, MiniMax H3, Veo-class and image models behind one app, so you do not need separate subscriptions
  • Own synced-audio models (Soundtrack, SFX, Speech, Music) that score or voice a generated scene in the same tool, priced by Pika as the lowest-cost audio option

Watch out

  • Free plan has no monthly credits, so you buy packs before you can test much
  • Resolution and clip-length limits per plan are not published on the pricing page
Full Pika review →

Runway

Pick it for

  • Previs and shot tests with Gen-4.5 before committing to a shoot
  • Fixing finished footage with Aleph 2.0, such as swapping backgrounds or wardrobe across a clip
  • Agency ad and campaign work using Agent, Brand Kits and Projects

Stands out

  • Gen-4.5 and Aleph 2.0 sit in one credit pool with third-party models such as Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0 and Nano Banana Pro, so you can compare models without separate subscriptions.
  • Aleph 2.0 edits existing footage rather than generating new clips, which keeps the rest of a shot stable.

Watch out

  • Credits burn fast: about 12 credits per second for Gen-4.5 and about 28 for Aleph 2.0
  • Single generations run about 10 seconds, so longer scenes need stitching
Full Runway review →

Each column comes from that tool's own researched page, checked against vendor pricing and changelog pages (oldest check: ). Sources are listed on each tool's page.

Build a different comparison →
Powered by ReelStack

Help keep this running

Your tip funds servers, models, and the time it takes to ship new tools faster. Set any amount below — every bit helps.