Adobe Firefly vs Flux vs Leonardo.ai vs LumiYing
A side-by-side look at Adobe Firefly, Flux, Leonardo.ai and LumiYing for filmmakers: what each one can do, what it costs, and where they actually differ.
-
Adobe's generative studio for images, video and audio, with commercially cleared models and partner models
- Price
- Free daily generations, or Standard from $9.99/mo (2,000 credits); Pro Plus and Premium have a 30% first-year promo ending Oct 21
- Learning
- Easy
- Best for
- Generative fill and object removal on plates, stills and reference frames in Photoshop
-
Image model family for accurate text and photoreal stills, plus FLUX 3 video with native audio
- Price
- Pay per image on the API, from $0.014 (FLUX.2 klein 4B). Open weights are free for non-commercial use; commercial open-weights licences are quoted by sales.
- Learning
- Moderate
- Best for
- Key art and concept frames where legible text in the image matters
-
Image and video generation with a canvas, Motion animation and third-party video models
- Price
- See the vendor's pricing page
- Learning
- Easy
- Best for
- Concept art and key-art stills that later become motion tests
-
Seedance, Kling, GPT Image and Nano Banana on one credit balance for filmmakers.
- Price
- Credit packs from $19.90 one-time (1,000 credits); no subscription
- Learning
- Easy
- Best for
- Running one shot prompt through Seedance, Kling and GPT Image to pick a model before committing budget
The short version
Where they differ
- Flux is the only one without third-party models.
All 4 offer: text to image, image editing, text to video, image to video.
Feature by feature
Adobe Firefly vs Flux vs Leonardo.ai vs LumiYing: capabilities
| Adobe Firefly | Flux | Leonardo.ai | LumiYing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free daily generations, or Standard from $9.99/mo (2,000 credits); Pro Plus and Premium have a 30% first-year promo ending Oct 21 | Pay per image on the API, from $0.014 (FLUX.2 klein 4B). Open weights are free for non-commercial use; commercial open-weights licences are quoted by sales. | See the vendor's pricing page | Credit packs from $19.90 one-time (1,000 credits); no subscription |
| Infinite canvas | Yes | No | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Node / flow builder | Not confirmed | No | Partial | No |
| AI agent | Yes | No | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Chat assistant | Yes | No | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Team collaboration | Yes | Not confirmed | Partial | Not confirmed |
| Text to image | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Image editing | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Text to video | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Image to video | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Video to video | Yes | Partial | Not confirmed | Partial |
| Native audio in video | Not confirmed | Yes | Partial | Not confirmed |
| Lip-sync | Not confirmed | Yes | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Voice / TTS | Yes | Partial | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Music & SFX | Yes | Partial | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Upscaling | Yes | Yes | Partial | Not confirmed |
| Character consistency | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Camera control | Not confirmed | Partial | Partial | Not confirmed |
| Custom training | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Third-party models | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not confirmed |
| MCP server | Not confirmed | Yes | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Mobile app | Not confirmed | Not confirmed | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Desktop / local | Partial | Yes | No | No |
| Open source | No | Partial | No | No |
| Free tier | Yes | Partial | Yes | Partial |
| Commercial use | Yes | Partial | Yes | Not confirmed |
Each column comes from that tool's own researched page. "Not confirmed" means the vendor doesn't say.
Plans
Pricing compared
Adobe Firefly
| Free | Freemonthly |
|---|---|
| Standard | $9.99monthly |
| Pro | $19.99monthly |
| Pro Plus | $49.99 ($34.97 first year, promo ends Oct 21)monthly |
| Premium | $199.99 ($139.91 first year, promo ends Oct 21)monthly |
| Pro for teams | $19.99 per licensemonthly, annual |
| Pro Plus for teams | $49.99 per licensemonthly, annual |
| Premium for teams | $199.99 per licensemonthly, annual |
Flux
| Open weights, non-commercial | Freeone-time download |
|---|---|
| API pay-as-you-go | From $0.014 per imagepay-per-image |
| Builder (open-weights licence) | Contact saleslicence |
| Platform (open-weights licence) | Contact saleslicence |
| Professional (open-weights licence) | Contact saleslicence |
| Enterprise | Contact salescustom |
Leonardo.ai
| Free | $0monthly |
|---|---|
| API | Pay as you gousage |
LumiYing
| Starter | $19.90one-time |
|---|---|
| Pro | $39.90 (was $44.80)one-time |
| Max | $69.90 (was $90.00)one-time |
The verdict
Which one should you pick?
Adobe Firefly
Pick it for
- Generative fill and object removal on plates, stills and reference frames in Photoshop
- Storyboard and mood-board work in Boards, with partner models for each shot
- Filmmakers already paying for Creative Cloud who want AI inside Premiere and After Effects
Stands out
- Commercial-clearance story: Adobe's own models are trained on Adobe Stock and licensed or public-domain content, and Adobe says outputs are safe for commercial use. Partner-model outputs carry their own terms.
- Native Creative Cloud integration: generative fill, removal and expansion run inside Photoshop, and Premiere Pro and After Effects get Firefly features. Midjourney, Flux, Leonardo and Stable Diffusion have no equivalent in an NLE.
Watch out
- Image quality for photoreal hero art still trails Midjourney and Flux in most side-by-side comparisons
- Credits are consumed at different rates by model, so one plan's allowance is hard to predict across partner models
Flux
Pick it for
- Key art and concept frames where legible text in the image matters
- Environment plates and set-design variations at 2K or 4K, priced per megapixel
- Studios that want open weights and custom LoRAs running locally in ComfyUI
Stands out
- Open weights: FLUX.2 [dev] and the klein models can be downloaded, self-hosted and fine-tuned, with LoRA rights on the licensed tiers. Midjourney is closed.
- Pay per image with no subscription: FLUX.2 [klein] 4B from $0.014 per image, FLUX.2 [pro] from $0.03. Midjourney and Adobe Firefly sell monthly plans.
Watch out
- Video is new. FLUX 3 Video availability and FLUX 3 Image early access have been described differently across sources, and video pricing is not published
- Open-weights models are non-commercial by default, and commercial use needs a licence quoted by sales
Leonardo.ai
Pick it for
- Concept art and key-art stills that later become motion tests
- Animatic and previz stills turned into 5-second motion clips
- Custom-trained visual styles for a short film or music video look
Stands out
- Canvas-first editing (AI Canvas for inpainting and outpainting, plus a realtime mode) in the same tool as image and video generation
- Several model families under one account, including Leonardo's own Lucid and Motion 2.0 alongside third-party video models such as Kling 3.0 and Veo 3.1
Watch out
- Video is short (about 5 seconds on Motion 2.0) and not built for sequences or dialogue scenes
- Hosted third-party models are removed on short notice, so a workflow that depends on one can break mid-project
LumiYing
Pick it for
- Running one shot prompt through Seedance, Kling and GPT Image to pick a model before committing budget
- Pre-viz and storyboard frames from character sheets and reference stills
- Extending or re-editing a short AI clip without starting over
Stands out
- One credit balance across Seedance, Kling, GPT Image, Nano Banana and Midjourney, instead of separate subscriptions for each model
- Credits never expire and there is no monthly reset, which suits project-based work better than a monthly plan
Watch out
- No API, MCP server, canvas or node workflow documented on the official site
- Output is only as good as the upstream model, and access depends on those vendors staying available
Each column comes from that tool's own researched page, checked against vendor pricing and changelog pages (oldest check: ). Sources are listed on each tool's page.
Build a different comparison →