Kling AI vs Runway vs Google Veo 3

A side-by-side look at Kling AI, Runway and Google Veo 3 for filmmakers: what each one can do, what it costs, and where they actually differ.

  • Text, image and video-reference AI video with native audio, lip-sync and shot storyboarding

    Price
    See the vendor's pricing page
    Learning
    Moderate
    Best for
    Character-driven short films that need the same actor across many shots
  • Gen-4.5 video, Aleph 2.0 video editing and an agent that builds whole ad campaigns

    Price
    Free (125 one-time credits); Standard $15/mo ($12/mo billed annually)
    Learning
    Easy
    Best for
    Previs and shot tests with Gen-4.5 before committing to a shoot
  • Google's Veo 3.1 video model: up to 4K clips with native audio via Gemini API and Flow

    Price
    Gemini API: $0.05 to $0.60 per generated second depending on tier and resolution. Consumer access via Google AI Plus from EUR 4.99/mo (200 Flow credits).
    Learning
    Easy
    Best for
    Previs and animatics for narrative scenes where audio matters from the first pass
The short version

Where they differ

  • Google Veo 3 is the only one without text to image.
  • Only Runway offers third-party models.
  • Google Veo 3 is the only one without free tier.

All 3 offer: text to video, image to video, public API.

Feature by feature

Kling AI vs Runway vs Google Veo 3: capabilities

Kling AI vs Runway vs Google Veo 3
Kling AI Runway Google Veo 3
Price See the vendor's pricing page Free (125 one-time credits); Standard $15/mo ($12/mo billed annually) Gemini API: $0.05 to $0.60 per generated second depending on tier and resolution. Consumer access via Google AI Plus from EUR 4.99/mo (200 Flow credits).
Infinite canvas Partial Not confirmed Not confirmed
Node / flow builder Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
AI agent Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
Chat assistant Not confirmed Yes Partial
Team collaboration Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
Text to image Yes Yes No
Image editing Not confirmed Yes No
Text to video Yes Yes Yes
Image to video Yes Yes Yes
Video to video Yes Yes Partial
Native audio in video Yes Partial Yes
Lip-sync Yes Not confirmed Not confirmed
Voice / TTS Partial Yes No
Music & SFX Not confirmed Yes No
Upscaling Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
Character consistency Yes Partial Partial
Camera control Yes Not confirmed Partial
Custom training Not confirmed Partial No
Third-party models No Yes No
Public API Yes Yes Yes
MCP server Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
Mobile app Not confirmed Yes Not confirmed
Free tier Yes Yes No
Commercial use Yes Not confirmed Not confirmed

Each column comes from that tool's own researched page. "Not confirmed" means the vendor doesn't say.

Plans

Pricing compared

Kling AI

Kling AI plans
Free$0monthly

Runway

Runway plans
Free$0none
Standard$15monthly
Pro$35monthly
Max$95monthly

Google Veo 3

Google Veo 3 plans
Gemini API Veo 3.1 Lite$0.05/s (720p), $0.08/s (1080p)usage
Gemini API Veo 3.1 Fast$0.10/s (720p), $0.12/s (1080p), $0.30/s (4K)usage
Gemini API Veo 3.1 Standard$0.40/s (720p and 1080p), $0.60/s (4K)usage
Google AI PlusEUR 4.99monthly
Google AI ProEUR 21.99monthly
Google AI UltraEUR 99.99 (5x limits) or EUR 219.99 (20x limits)monthly
The verdict

Which one should you pick?

Kling AI

Pick it for

  • Character-driven short films that need the same actor across many shots
  • Previs and storyboard visualisation from shot-by-shot prompts
  • Multi-language talking-head and dubbed social content

Stands out

  • Video 3.0 Omni reference system: carries a character's look, expressions and voice traits from reference clips into new shots
  • Storyboarding sets duration, shot size, perspective and camera movement per shot, which few generators expose this directly

Watch out

  • Free output is watermarked and not for commercial use
  • Lip-sync and voice are less of a focus than dedicated voice tools (ElevenLabs, HeyGen)
Full Kling AI review →

Runway

Pick it for

  • Previs and shot tests with Gen-4.5 before committing to a shoot
  • Fixing finished footage with Aleph 2.0, such as swapping backgrounds or wardrobe across a clip
  • Agency ad and campaign work using Agent, Brand Kits and Projects

Stands out

  • Gen-4.5 and Aleph 2.0 sit in one credit pool with third-party models such as Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0 and Nano Banana Pro, so you can compare models without separate subscriptions.
  • Aleph 2.0 edits existing footage rather than generating new clips, which keeps the rest of a shot stable.

Watch out

  • Credits burn fast: about 12 credits per second for Gen-4.5 and about 28 for Aleph 2.0
  • Single generations run about 10 seconds, so longer scenes need stitching
Full Runway review →

Google Veo 3

Pick it for

  • Previs and animatics for narrative scenes where audio matters from the first pass
  • Short commercial or music-video B-roll at 4K on 8-second shots
  • Exploring shot options cheaply with Veo 3.1 Lite before paying for Standard

Stands out

  • Native audio is generated with the picture (dialogue, SFX, ambience) and is included in the listed per-second price, not a separate charge.
  • 4K output on 8-second clips, where most competitors top out at 1080p in the same price band (Veo's own 4K tier costs $0.60 per second).

Watch out

  • 8-second maximum per generation; longer shots need extensions or stitching
  • Extension only works at 720p and only on Veo-generated footage
Full Google Veo 3 review →

Each column comes from that tool's own researched page, checked against vendor pricing and changelog pages (oldest check: ). Sources are listed on each tool's page.

Build a different comparison →
Powered by ReelStack

Help keep this running

Your tip funds servers, models, and the time it takes to ship new tools faster. Set any amount below — every bit helps.